U.S. ranking · USGS ComCat
Most Earthquake-Prone U.S. States
U.S. states and territories ranked by total catalogued M4+ earthquakes.
- Alaska
- #1
- 8,929
- M4+ events
- 38
- ranked states
The verdict
Alaska leads with 8,929, ahead of Northern Mariana Islands (3,322) and Guam (2,453) across 38 ranked U.S. states & territories.
- Alaska
- #1 - 8,929
- #2 Northern Mariana Islands
- 3,322
- 85%
- share held by the top 3
- 38
- U.S. states & territories ranked
Counts reflect both real seismicity and monitoring density; read alongside population exposure for risk.
Top 12 U.S. states & territories by m4+ events
U.S. states and territories ranked by total catalogued M4+ earthquakes.
- Alaska
Alaska: 8,929 M4+ events
8,929
- Northern Mariana Islands 3,322
Northern Mariana Islands: 3,322 M4+ events
3,322
- Guam 2,453
Guam: 2,453 M4+ events
2,453
- California 877
California: 877 M4+ events
877
- Puerto Rico 296
Puerto Rico: 296 M4+ events
296
- Oregon 263
Oregon: 263 M4+ events
263
- U.S. Virgin Islands 220
U.S. Virgin Islands: 220 M4+ events
220
- Hawaii 203
Hawaii: 203 M4+ events
203
- Nevada 168
Nevada: 168 M4+ events
168
- Oklahoma 97
Oklahoma: 97 M4+ events
97
- Idaho 73
Idaho: 73 M4+ events
73
- Georgia 67
Georgia: 67 M4+ events
67
What this shows Alaska dominates U.S. seismicity thanks to the Aleutian Subduction Zone, where the Pacific Plate dives beneath North America. California follows, driven by the San Andreas system. Pacific territories, the Northern Mariana Islands and Guam, also rank high, sitting directly on the Ring of Fire.
Full ranking
M4+ events for all 38 ranked U.S. states & territories. Select any entry for its full seismic profile.
| # | State / territory | M4+ events |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alaska | 8,929 |
| 2 | Northern Mariana Islands | 3,322 |
| 3 | Guam | 2,453 |
| 4 | California | 877 |
| 5 | Puerto Rico | 296 |
| 6 | Oregon | 263 |
| 7 | U.S. Virgin Islands | 220 |
| 8 | Hawaii | 203 |
| 9 | Nevada | 168 |
| 10 | Oklahoma | 97 |
| 11 | Idaho | 73 |
| 12 | Georgia | 67 |
| 13 | Texas | 51 |
| 14 | New Mexico | 36 |
| 15 | Montana | 28 |
| 16 | Utah | 25 |
| 17 | American Samoa | 24 |
| 18 | Washington | 17 |
| 19 | Wyoming | 13 |
| 20 | Colorado | 12 |
| 21 | Kansas | 12 |
| 22 | Arizona | 7 |
| 23 | Arkansas | 5 |
| 24 | Virginia | 5 |
| 25 | Louisiana | 4 |
| 26 | Tennessee | 3 |
| 27 | Illinois | 3 |
| 28 | Nebraska | 2 |
| 29 | Missouri | 2 |
| 30 | Kentucky | 1 |
| 31 | Maine | 1 |
| 32 | South Carolina | 1 |
| 33 | Michigan | 1 |
| 34 | Delaware | 1 |
| 35 | Ohio | 1 |
| 36 | Maryland | 1 |
| 37 | North Carolina | 1 |
| 38 | Florida | 1 |
Source: USGS Comprehensive Earthquake Catalog (ComCat).
Frequently asked questions
Why does Alaska have so many earthquakes? ▼
Alaska sits above the Aleutian Subduction Zone, one of the most active tectonic boundaries on Earth. It has experienced three of the ten largest earthquakes ever recorded, including the M9.2 1964 Great Alaska Earthquake.
Are all states at earthquake risk? ▼
Western states face the highest risk, but every state has recorded earthquakes. The New Madrid Seismic Zone (Missouri, Arkansas, Tennessee) produced some of the largest quakes in U.S. history in 1811–1812, and Charleston, SC saw an M7.3 in 1886.
Other rankings
About this data
These rankings are computed directly from the USGS Comprehensive Earthquake Catalog (ComCat), the public-domain record maintained by the USGS Earthquake Hazards Program. Count-based leaderboards use the worldwide catalog of magnitude-4.0-and-above events from 2005 onward, the period over which the global seismograph network reliably detects and locates earthquakes everywhere, while magnitude leaderboards use the significant-event series of magnitude-6.0-and-above earthquakes stretching back to 1900. Magnitudes use the moment-magnitude scale (Mw), the modern standard that supersedes the older Richter scale; because the scale is logarithmic, each whole step up represents roughly thirty-two times more energy released. Remember that raw counts partly measure monitoring density, not only underlying seismicity, and that one historic outlier can anchor a high maximum magnitude, read each leaderboard alongside population exposure and building stock before drawing conclusions about real-world risk.
Source: USGS ComCat, verify with USGS → · See our methodology for the full pipeline.