Global ranking · USGS ComCat
Countries with the Most Significant Earthquakes
Countries ranked by number of significant (M6+) earthquakes catalogued.
- Indonesia
- #1
- 323
- M6+ events
- 50
- ranked countries
The verdict
Indonesia leads with 323, ahead of Japan (229) and Papua New Guinea (212) across 50 ranked countries.
- Indonesia
- #1 - 323
- #2 Japan
- 229
- 31%
- share held by the top 3
- 50
- countries ranked
Counts reflect both real seismicity and monitoring density; read alongside population exposure for risk.
Top 12 countries by m6+ events
Countries ranked by number of significant (M6+) earthquakes catalogued.
- Indonesia
Indonesia: 323 M6+ events
323
- Japan
Japan: 229 M6+ events
229
- Papua New Guinea
Papua New Guinea: 212 M6+ events
212
- Chile
Chile: 160 M6+ events
160
- United States
United States: 159 M6+ events
159
- Vanuatu
Vanuatu: 146 M6+ events
146
- Philippines
Philippines: 132 M6+ events
132
- Russia 122
Russia: 122 M6+ events
122
- Tonga 116
Tonga: 116 M6+ events
116
- Solomon Islands 102
Solomon Islands: 102 M6+ events
102
- Mexico 70
Mexico: 70 M6+ events
70
- New Zealand 70
New Zealand: 70 M6+ events
70
What this shows Significant (M6+) earthquakes are the ones that cause real damage. Countries topping this list combine high seismic activity with proximity to subduction zones. The count reflects how often a country faces genuinely dangerous shaking, not just how many small tremors it records.
Full ranking
M6+ events for all 50 ranked countries. Select any entry for its full seismic profile.
| # | Country | M6+ events |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Indonesia | 323 |
| 2 | Japan | 229 |
| 3 | Papua New Guinea | 212 |
| 4 | Chile | 160 |
| 5 | United States | 159 |
| 6 | Vanuatu | 146 |
| 7 | Philippines | 132 |
| 8 | Russia | 122 |
| 9 | Tonga | 116 |
| 10 | Solomon Islands | 102 |
| 11 | Mexico | 70 |
| 12 | New Zealand | 70 |
| 13 | Peru | 55 |
| 14 | Argentina | 42 |
| 15 | Japan region | 41 |
| 16 | New Caledonia | 34 |
| 17 | Taiwan | 31 |
| 18 | China | 31 |
| 19 | Fiji | 30 |
| 20 | Greece | 28 |
| 21 | Panama | 27 |
| 22 | Canada | 24 |
| 23 | Iran | 24 |
| 24 | Afghanistan | 23 |
| 25 | Timor Leste | 23 |
| 26 | Ecuador | 21 |
| 27 | Guatemala | 16 |
| 28 | Colombia | 14 |
| 29 | Turkey | 14 |
| 30 | India | 14 |
| 31 | India region | 14 |
| 32 | Wallis and Futuna | 12 |
| 33 | Micronesia | 11 |
| 34 | El Salvador | 11 |
| 35 | Nicaragua | 10 |
| 36 | Pakistan | 8 |
| 37 | Nepal | 8 |
| 38 | Venezuela | 8 |
| 39 | Myanmar | 7 |
| 40 | Costa Rica | 7 |
| 41 | Tajikistan | 7 |
| 42 | Bolivia | 7 |
| 43 | Italy | 7 |
| 44 | New Zealand region | 7 |
| 45 | Brazil | 7 |
| 46 | Svalbard and Jan Mayen | 6 |
| 47 | Alaska Earthquake | 5 |
| 48 | Yemen | 4 |
| 49 | Portugal | 3 |
| 50 | Kyrgyzstan | 3 |
Source: USGS Comprehensive Earthquake Catalog (ComCat).
Frequently asked questions
What makes an earthquake significant here? ▼
On PlainQuake, "significant" means magnitude 6.0 and above, the threshold at which structural damage becomes likely in populated areas.
Why do some countries with fewer total earthquakes rank high here? ▼
Because this counts only the damaging M6+ band. A country can record many small tremors but few large ones, or vice-versa, depending on its tectonic setting.
Other rankings
About this data
These rankings are computed directly from the USGS Comprehensive Earthquake Catalog (ComCat), the public-domain record maintained by the USGS Earthquake Hazards Program. Count-based leaderboards use the worldwide catalog of magnitude-4.0-and-above events from 2005 onward, the period over which the global seismograph network reliably detects and locates earthquakes everywhere, while magnitude leaderboards use the significant-event series of magnitude-6.0-and-above earthquakes stretching back to 1900. Magnitudes use the moment-magnitude scale (Mw), the modern standard that supersedes the older Richter scale; because the scale is logarithmic, each whole step up represents roughly thirty-two times more energy released. Remember that raw counts partly measure monitoring density, not only underlying seismicity, and that one historic outlier can anchor a high maximum magnitude, read each leaderboard alongside population exposure and building stock before drawing conclusions about real-world risk.
Source: USGS ComCat, verify with USGS → · See our methodology for the full pipeline.